33637

Legal Resources for the 33637 Zip Code
Statistics for the 33637 Zip Code
Property/Housing/Real Estate Information for the 33637 Zip Code
Family Information for the 33637 Zip Code
Education Information for the 33637 Zip Code
Public Benefits Information for the 33637 Zip Code
Immigration & Civil Rights Information for the 33637 Zip Code
Cities for the 33637 Zip Code

Legal Resources for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top

Florida Constitution
Florida Code

Florida State Resources
Florida Website
Florida Governor
Florida
Florida Courts
Florida Government Resources

Lawyers for the 33637 Zip Code

State Attorney General
Federal Courts
Florida Middle

US Attorneys [ Tampa - Main Office | Jacksonville | Fort Myers | Satellite Office | Orlando ]
Public Defenders [ Main Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office ]
Bankruptcy Court [ Main Office - Tampa | Jacksonville | Orlando ]
District Court [ Main Office - Orlando | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Ocala | Tampa ]
Pretrial Services [ Main Office - Orlando | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Tampa ]
Probation Office [ Main Office - Tampa | Cocoa | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Naples | Ocala | Orlando | Sarasota ]

Statistics for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top

Population (2000): 12,534
Land Area (2000): 20.926 square kilometers
Water Area (2000): 0.385 square kilometers

Urban/Rural	Population	Percent
Urban	12,589	99.87%
Rural, Farm	0	0.00%
Rural, Non-farm	17	0.13%

Employment Information for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top
Hours Worked Per Week In 1999 for the 33637 Zip Code

Hours Per Week	Population	Percent
35 or more hours	6,026	62.30%
15-35 hours	1,342	13.87%
1-14 hours	222	2.30%
No regular hours	2,083	21.53%

Time Left For Work for the 33637 Zip Code

Time	Population	Percent
Midnight-4:59 AM	282	4.13%
5 AM-5:29 AM	98	1.44%
5:30 AM-5:59 AM	156	2.29%
6 AM-6:29 AM	541	7.93%
6:30 AM-6:59 AM	689	10.10%
7 AM-7:29 AM	1,085	15.90%
7:30 AM-7:59 AM	1,153	16.90%
8 AM-8:29 AM	720	10.55%
8:30 AM-8:59 AM	415	6.08%
9:00 AM-9:59 AM	465	6.82%
10:00 AM-10:59 AM	160	2.35%
11:00 AM-11:59 AM	100	1.47%
Noon-3:59 PM	509	7.46%
4 PM-11:59 PM	450	6.60%

Length Of Commute In Minutes for the 33637 Zip Code

Minutes	Population	Percent
Less than 5	74	1.08%
5-9	572	8.38%
10-14	942	13.81%
15-19	1,218	17.85%
20-24	1,203	17.63%
25-29	436	6.39%
30-34	990	14.51%
35-39	185	2.71%
40-44	146	2.14%
45-59	688	10.08%
60-89	269	3.94%
At least 90	100	1.47%

Length Of Commute In Minutes - Public vs. Private Transportation for the 33637 Zip Code

Minutes	Population (public)	Percent	Population (private)	Percent
Under 30	0	0.00%	4,445	65.15%
30-44	0	0.00%	1,321	19.36%
45-59	13	0.19%	675	9.89%
At least 60	19	0.28%	350	5.13%

Type Of Commute for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Bicycle	0	0.00%
Car / truck / van, carpool	690	9.94%
Car / truck / van, solo	5,955	85.75%
Motorcycle	5	0.07%
Other	52	0.75%
Public transportation	32	0.46%
Walked	89	1.28%
Worked at home	122	1.76%

Family Information for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top
: 1,183
: 4,237
Household Income in 1999 for the 33637 Zip Code

Income	Population	Percent
Under $10,000	496	9.32%
$10,000-$14,999	303	5.69%
$15,000-$19,999	355	6.67%
$20,000-$24,999	442	8.31%
$25,000-$29,999	312	5.86%
$30,000-$34,999	421	7.91%
$35,000-$39,999	455	8.55%
$40,000-$44,999	437	8.21%
$45,000-$49,999	384	7.22%
$50,000-$59,999	639	12.01%
$60,000-$74,999	401	7.53%
$75,000-$99,999	436	8.19%
$100,000-$124,999	139	2.61%
$125,000-$149,999	44	0.83%
$150,000-$199,999	48	0.90%
$200,000 or more	10	0.19%

Household Type for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Nonfamily, 1 person	1,629	30.75%
Family, 2 people	1,260	23.79%
Nonfamily, 2 people	492	9.29%
Family, 3 people	784	14.80%
Nonfamily, 3 people	74	1.40%
Family, 4 people	650	12.27%
Nonfamily, 4 people	11	0.21%
Family, 5 people	265	5.00%
Nonfamily, 5 people	1	0.02%
Family, 6 people	94	1.77%
Nonfamily, 6 people	3	0.06%
Family, 7 or more people	34	0.64%
Nonfamily, 7 or more people	0	0.00%

Household Income Type for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Earnings	4,609	35.07%
Interest / Dividend / Rent	1,389	10.57%
Public Assistance	69	0.52%
Retirement	552	4.20%
Self Employment	497	3.78%
Social Security	852	6.48%
Supplemental Security	128	0.97%
Wage / Salary	4,463	33.95%
Other	585	4.45%

Family Type for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
No children under 18	961	47.55%
With children under 18	1,060	52.45%

Marital Status - Male (for those 15+ in 2000) for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Divorced	610	12.96%
Married	2,383	50.64%
Never Married	1,662	35.32%
Widowed	51	1.08%

Marital Status - Female (for those 15+ in 2000) for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Divorced	873	17.13%
Married	2,373	46.58%
Never Married	1,406	27.60%
Widowed	443	8.69%

Education Information for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top
Highest Degree Earned (18 or older) for the 33637 Zip Code

Degree	Population	Percent
Less than 9th grade	238	2.53%
9th-12th grade, no diploma	1,042	11.07%
High school diploma or equivalent	2,405	25.54%
Some college, no degree	2,471	26.25%
Associate degree	863	9.17%
Bachelors degree	1,735	18.43%
Graduate or professional degree	661	7.02%

Population In School (3 or older) for the 33637 Zip Code

School Level	In Public School	Percent	In Private School	Percent	Total	Percent
Nursery or preschool	72	0.57%	130	1.04%	202	1.61%
Kindergarten	168	1.34%	23	0.18%	191	1.52%
Grades 1-4	836	6.67%	100	0.80%	936	7.47%
Grades 5-8	607	4.84%	72	0.57%	679	5.42%
Grades 9-12	509	4.06%	23	0.18%	532	4.24%
Undergrad college	829	6.61%	243	1.94%	1,072	8.55%
Graduate or professional school	193	1.54%	65	0.52%	258	2.06%
Total	3,214	25.64%	656	5.23%	3,870	30.88%

Public Benefits Information for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top
Above Or Below Poverty Level In 1999 for the 33637 Zip Code

Above/Below	Population	Percent
At Or Above Poverty Level	10,927	87.74%
Below Poverty Level	1,527	12.26%

Immigration & Civil Rights Information for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top
Population By Age for the 33637 Zip Code

Age	Population	Percent
0-9 Years	1,903	15.18%
10-19 Years	1,603	12.79%
20-29 Years	2,726	21.75%
30-39 Years	2,143	17.10%
40-49 Years	1,783	14.23%
50-59 Years	1,131	9.02%
60-69 Years	640	5.11%
70-79 Years	430	3.43%
80-89 Years	147	1.17%
90+ Years	28	0.22%

Population - Male/Female for the 33637 Zip Code

Male/Female	Population	Percent
Male	6,046	48.24%
Female	6,488	51.76%

Population By Ethnicity for the 33637 Zip Code

Ethnicity	Population	Percent
Caucasian	8,191	65.35%
African-American	2,056	16.40%
Hispanic/Latino	1,594	12.72%
Asian	310	2.47%
Multiracial	266	2.12%
Amerindian	58	0.46%
Other Race	46	0.37%
Pacific Islander	13	0.10%

Top Specified Ancestries for the 33637 Zip Code

Rank	Ancestry	Population	Percent Of Specified Ancestries
1.	German	1,697	18.55%
2.	Irish	1,362	14.89%
3.	English	1,122	12.26%
4.	Italian	815	8.91%
5.	United States Or American	794	8.68%
6.	French Non-Basque	392	4.28%
7.	Scotch Irish	372	4.07%
8.	Scottish	359	3.92%
9.	Polish	253	2.77%
10.	Swedish	249	2.72%

Top Languages Spoken At Home for the 33637 Zip Code

Rank	Language	Population	Percent Of Reported Languages
1.	Only English	9,737	83.18%
2.	Spanish Or Spanish Creole	1,156	9.88%
3.	Arabic	192	1.64%
4.	Tagalog	102	0.87%
5.	Other Asian	84	0.72%
6.	French	65	0.56%
7.	Italian	58	0.50%
8.	German	46	0.39%
9.	Portuguese / Portuguese Creole	36	0.31%
10.	French Creole	35	0.30%

Citizen Type for the 33637 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Citizen by birth	11,138	88.35%
Naturalized immigrant	588	4.66%
Not a citizen	880	6.98%

Cities for the 33637 Zip Code Back to top

Alphabetical | By Population

Tampa

Today on Verdict

Progressives Need to Take the Gloves Off and Play Hardball with Our Rogue Supreme Court

Amherst professor Austin Sarat discusses the increasingly partisan and unethical behavior of the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, providing examples of actions by Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas that he argues undermine public trust in the institution. Professor Sarat contends that progressives in Congress need to take more aggressive action, beyond speeches and task forces, to hold the Court accountable and rein in rogue behavior, suggesting they use their oversight powers to subpoena justices and potentially reduce the Court’s budget.