32707

Legal Resources for the 32707 Zip Code
Statistics for the 32707 Zip Code
Property/Housing/Real Estate Information for the 32707 Zip Code
Family Information for the 32707 Zip Code
Education Information for the 32707 Zip Code
Public Benefits Information for the 32707 Zip Code
Immigration & Civil Rights Information for the 32707 Zip Code
Cities for the 32707 Zip Code

Legal Resources for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top

Florida Constitution
Florida Code

Florida State Resources
Florida Website
Florida Governor
Florida
Florida Courts
Florida Government Resources

Lawyers for the 32707 Zip Code

State Attorney General
Federal Courts
Florida Middle

US Attorneys [ Tampa - Main Office | Jacksonville | Fort Myers | Satellite Office | Orlando ]
Public Defenders [ Main Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office | Satellite Office ]
Bankruptcy Court [ Main Office - Tampa | Jacksonville | Orlando ]
District Court [ Main Office - Orlando | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Ocala | Tampa ]
Pretrial Services [ Main Office - Orlando | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Tampa ]
Probation Office [ Main Office - Tampa | Cocoa | Fort Myers | Jacksonville | Naples | Ocala | Orlando | Sarasota ]

Statistics for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top

Population (2000): 33,716
Land Area (2000): 28.761 square kilometers
Water Area (2000): 3.330 square kilometers

Back to top
: 14,595

Employment Information for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top
Hours Worked Per Week In 1999 for the 32707 Zip Code

Hours Per Week	Population	Percent
35 or more hours	15,939	60.31%
15-35 hours	3,633	13.75%
1-14 hours	666	2.52%
No regular hours	6,192	23.43%

Time Left For Work for the 32707 Zip Code

Time	Population	Percent
Midnight-4:59 AM	460	2.61%
5 AM-5:29 AM	365	2.07%
5:30 AM-5:59 AM	508	2.89%
6 AM-6:29 AM	1,391	7.91%
6:30 AM-6:59 AM	1,630	9.26%
7 AM-7:29 AM	2,864	16.28%
7:30 AM-7:59 AM	2,678	15.22%
8 AM-8:29 AM	2,366	13.45%
8:30 AM-8:59 AM	1,045	5.94%
9:00 AM-9:59 AM	1,462	8.31%
10:00 AM-10:59 AM	424	2.41%
11:00 AM-11:59 AM	283	1.61%
Noon-3:59 PM	1,161	6.60%
4 PM-11:59 PM	959	5.45%

Length Of Commute In Minutes for the 32707 Zip Code

Minutes	Population	Percent
Less than 5	308	1.75%
5-9	1,404	7.98%
10-14	2,143	12.18%
15-19	2,294	13.04%
20-24	3,028	17.21%
25-29	1,081	6.14%
30-34	3,309	18.81%
35-39	529	3.01%
40-44	841	4.78%
45-59	1,456	8.27%
60-89	809	4.60%
At least 90	394	2.24%

Length Of Commute In Minutes - Public vs. Private Transportation for the 32707 Zip Code

Minutes	Population (public)	Percent	Population (private)	Percent
Under 30	27	0.15%	10,231	58.14%
30-44	62	0.35%	4,617	26.24%
45-59	11	0.06%	1,445	8.21%
At least 60	55	0.31%	1,148	6.52%

Type Of Commute for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Bicycle	71	0.39%
Car / truck / van, carpool	1,966	10.84%
Car / truck / van, solo	15,064	83.03%
Motorcycle	24	0.13%
Other	90	0.50%
Public transportation	155	0.85%
Walked	226	1.25%
Worked at home	547	3.01%

Family Information for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top
: 3,768
: 14,804
Household Income in 1999 for the 32707 Zip Code

Income	Population	Percent
Under $10,000	853	6.32%
$10,000-$14,999	769	5.70%
$15,000-$19,999	858	6.36%
$20,000-$24,999	984	7.29%
$25,000-$29,999	806	5.97%
$30,000-$34,999	908	6.73%
$35,000-$39,999	936	6.93%
$40,000-$44,999	992	7.35%
$45,000-$49,999	968	7.17%
$50,000-$59,999	1,432	10.61%
$60,000-$74,999	1,446	10.71%
$75,000-$99,999	1,202	8.91%
$100,000-$124,999	707	5.24%
$125,000-$149,999	302	2.24%
$150,000-$199,999	173	1.28%
$200,000 or more	161	1.19%

Household Type for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Nonfamily, 1 person	3,642	26.42%
Family, 2 people	3,786	27.46%
Nonfamily, 2 people	1,045	7.58%
Family, 3 people	2,302	16.70%
Nonfamily, 3 people	179	1.30%
Family, 4 people	1,744	12.65%
Nonfamily, 4 people	45	0.33%
Family, 5 people	708	5.14%
Nonfamily, 5 people	7	0.05%
Family, 6 people	230	1.67%
Nonfamily, 6 people	2	0.01%
Family, 7 or more people	91	0.66%
Nonfamily, 7 or more people	4	0.03%

Household Income Type for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Earnings	11,519	31.65%
Interest / Dividend / Rent	4,107	11.28%
Public Assistance	305	0.84%
Retirement	2,145	5.89%
Self Employment	1,765	4.85%
Social Security	3,392	9.32%
Supplemental Security	352	0.97%
Wage / Salary	11,091	30.47%
Other	1,721	4.73%

Family Type for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
No children under 18	3,856	57.59%
With children under 18	2,840	42.41%

Marital Status - Male (for those 15+ in 2000) for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Divorced	1,421	10.92%
Married	7,232	55.55%
Never Married	4,108	31.56%
Widowed	257	1.97%

Marital Status - Female (for those 15+ in 2000) for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Divorced	2,192	15.83%
Married	7,423	53.60%
Never Married	2,886	20.84%
Widowed	1,349	9.74%

Education Information for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top
Highest Degree Earned (18 or older) for the 32707 Zip Code

Degree	Population	Percent
Less than 9th grade	951	3.73%
9th-12th grade, no diploma	2,352	9.22%
High school diploma or equivalent	7,254	28.42%
Some college, no degree	6,859	26.87%
Associate degree	2,628	10.30%
Bachelors degree	3,882	15.21%
Graduate or professional degree	1,596	6.25%

Population In School (3 or older) for the 32707 Zip Code

School Level	In Public School	Percent	In Private School	Percent	Total	Percent
Nursery or preschool	241	0.71%	323	0.96%	564	1.67%
Kindergarten	311	0.92%	92	0.27%	403	1.20%
Grades 1-4	1,510	4.48%	214	0.63%	1,724	5.11%
Grades 5-8	1,567	4.65%	142	0.42%	1,709	5.07%
Grades 9-12	1,693	5.02%	168	0.50%	1,861	5.52%
Undergrad college	1,603	4.75%	147	0.44%	1,750	5.19%
Graduate or professional school	240	0.71%	131	0.39%	371	1.10%
Total	7,165	21.25%	1,217	3.61%	8,382	24.86%

Public Benefits Information for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top
Above Or Below Poverty Level In 1999 for the 32707 Zip Code

Above/Below	Population	Percent
At Or Above Poverty Level	30,358	92.34%
Below Poverty Level	2,520	7.66%

Immigration & Civil Rights Information for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top
Population By Age for the 32707 Zip Code

Age	Population	Percent
0-9 Years	4,093	12.14%
10-19 Years	4,350	12.90%
20-29 Years	4,828	14.32%
30-39 Years	5,555	16.48%
40-49 Years	5,503	16.32%
50-59 Years	3,971	11.78%
60-69 Years	2,599	7.71%
70-79 Years	1,941	5.76%
80-89 Years	774	2.30%
90+ Years	102	0.30%

Population - Male/Female for the 32707 Zip Code

Male/Female	Population	Percent
Male	16,565	49.13%
Female	17,151	50.87%

Population By Ethnicity for the 32707 Zip Code

Ethnicity	Population	Percent
Caucasian	26,105	77.43%
Hispanic/Latino	4,550	13.50%
African-American	1,578	4.68%
Asian	745	2.21%
Multiracial	581	1.72%
Other Race	89	0.26%
Amerindian	57	0.17%
Pacific Islander	11	0.03%

Top Specified Ancestries for the 32707 Zip Code

Rank	Ancestry	Population	Percent Of Specified Ancestries
1.	German	5,882	20.01%
2.	Irish	5,024	17.09%
3.	English	3,911	13.30%
4.	Italian	3,154	10.73%
5.	United States Or American	1,943	6.61%
6.	French Non-Basque	1,241	4.22%
7.	Polish	1,166	3.97%
8.	Scottish	775	2.64%
9.	Scotch Irish	591	2.01%
10.	Dutch	539	1.83%

Top Languages Spoken At Home for the 32707 Zip Code

Rank	Language	Population	Percent Of Reported Languages
1.	Only English	25,768	82.51%
2.	Spanish Or Spanish Creole	4,029	12.90%
3.	Vietnamese	189	0.61%
4.	Serbo Croatian	146	0.47%
5.	French	136	0.44%
6.	Arabic	129	0.41%
7.	Chinese	116	0.37%
8.	Italian	98	0.31%
9.	Portuguese / Portuguese Creole	92	0.29%
10.	Polish	78	0.25%

Citizen Type for the 32707 Zip Code

Type	Population	Percent
Citizen by birth	29,955	90.90%
Naturalized immigrant	1,438	4.36%
Not a citizen	1,560	4.73%

Cities for the 32707 Zip Code Back to top

Alphabetical | By Population

Casselberry

Today on Verdict

Progressives Need to Take the Gloves Off and Play Hardball with Our Rogue Supreme Court

Amherst professor Austin Sarat discusses the increasingly partisan and unethical behavior of the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, providing examples of actions by Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas that he argues undermine public trust in the institution. Professor Sarat contends that progressives in Congress need to take more aggressive action, beyond speeches and task forces, to hold the Court accountable and rein in rogue behavior, suggesting they use their oversight powers to subpoena justices and potentially reduce the Court’s budget.